Bananas are important to millions of people around the world as a source of food and income. Many children especially from the African continent eat mashed bananas as their first solid food during weaning. Banana Xanthomonas wilt (BXW) is a huge threat to banana production and if nothing is done to control the disease, 50% of production could be lost. Different interventions towards the control of the wilt have been tried, including cultural, biological, chemical, and genetic modifications. However, measures are inadequate in their capacities. The cultural methods are hindered by inconsistencies by farmers while administering. Biological, chemical, and genetic modifications face the challenge of resistance that might arise due to pathogen evolution. In addition, genetic modification attracts non-acceptance due to the novel genes introduced into the crop and the misconceptions created by interested groups. There is, therefore, a need to embrace new technological advances like gene editing (GE) which is viewed as the future of creating resistance in crops against diseases because, unlike genetic modifications, the novel genes are removed through the cell's natural processes. GE technology utilizes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9) to target genes intending to create resistance by knocking the susceptible genes out or by activating the expression of the defense genes. This review gives a synopsis of BXW's current control measures and the potential that GE has to address the disease more adequately.
| Published in | International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12 |
| Page(s) | 118-123 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Gene Editing, CRISPR-Cas9, Banana Xanthomonas Wilt
| [1] | E. Karamura, E. Frison, D. Karamura, and S. Sharrock, “Banana production systems in eastern and southern Africa,” Bananas and food security, vol. 401, p. 412, 1998. |
| [2] | N. W. Simmonds and K. Shepherd, “The taxonomy and origins of the cultivated bananas,” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 55, no. 359, pp. 302–312, 1955. |
| [3] | G. J. Scott, "A review of root, tuber and banana crops in developing countries: Past, present, and future," International Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1093–1114, 2021. |
| [4] | G. Ude, M. Pillay, D. Nwakanma, and A. Tenkouano, “Genetic diversity in Musa acuminata Colla and Musa balbisiana Colla and some of their natural hybrids using AFLP markers,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 1246–1252, 2002. |
| [5] | V. Voora, C. Larrea, and S. Bermudez, Global market report: bananas. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2020. |
| [6] | W. Tinzaara, D. Stoian, W. Ocimati, E. Kikulwe, G. Otieno, and G. Blomme, “Challenges and opportunities for smallholders in banana value chains,” Achieving sustainable cultivation of bananas, vol. 1, pp. 1–26, 2018. |
| [7] | G. Blomme et al., “Bacterial diseases of bananas and enset: current state of knowledge and integrated approaches toward sustainable management,” Frontiers in plant science, p. 1290, 2017. |
| [8] | V. Aritua et al., “Characterization of the Xanthomonas sp. causing wilt of enset and banana and its proposed reclassification as a strain of X. vasicola,” Plant pathology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 170–177, 2008. |
| [9] | G. A. Beattie, “Water relations in the interaction of foliar bacterial pathogens with plants,” Annual review of phytopathology, vol. 49, pp. 533–555, 2011. |
| [10] | G. Blomme et al., “Fine-tuning banana Xanthomonas wilt control options over the past decade in East and Central Africa,” European Journal of plant pathology, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 271–287, 2014. |
| [11] | M. Biruma et al., "Banana Xanthomonas wilt: a review of the disease, management strategies, and future research directions," African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 8, 2007. |
| [12] | J. Hodgetts et al., "Development of a lateral flow device for in-field detection and evaluation of PCR-based diagnostic methods for Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum, the causal agent of banana Xanthomonas wilt," Plant pathology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 559–567, 2015. |
| [13] | L. Sigillo, S. Esposito, P. Tripodi, G. Serratore, and C. Pane, “Host range and molecular typing of Xanthomonas spp. strains isolated from wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) in Italy,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 693–705, 2021. |
| [14] | S. Gnanamanickam, V. B. Priyadarisini, N. Narayanan, P. Vasudevan, and S. Kavitha, “An overview of bacterial blight disease of rice and strategies for its management,” Current Science, pp. 1435–1444, 1999. |
| [15] | J. J. Mapinda, G. G. Mwanga, and V. Masanja, "Modelling the transmission dynamics of banana Xanthomonas wilt disease with contaminated soil," 2019. |
| [16] | M. Wolde, A. Ayalew, and A. Chala, “Assessment of bacterial wilt (Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum) of enset in Southern Ethiopia,” African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 1724–1733, 2016. |
| [17] | O. I. Molina, M. Tenuta, A. El Hadrami, K. Buckley, C. Cavers, and F. Daayf, "Potato early dying and yield responses to compost, green manures, seed meal, and chemical treatments," American Journal of Potato Research, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 414–428, 2014. |
| [18] | J. R. VENETTE, “How Bacteria Find Their Hosts,” Phytopathogenic Prokaryotes V2, vol. 2, p. 1, 2012. |
| [19] | J. Smith, D. Jones, E. Karamura, G. Blomme, and F. Turyagyenda, "An analysis of the risk from Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum to banana cultivation in Eastern, Central, and Southern Africa.," 2008. |
| [20] | J. Janse, “Bacterial diseases that may or do emerge, with (possible) economic damage for Europe and the Mediterranean basin: Notes on epidemiology, risks, prevention and management on first occurrence,” Journal of Plant Pathology, pp. S5–S29, 2012. |
| [21] | W. Tinzara, C. Gold, W. Tushemereirwe, R. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Eden-Green, “The possible role of insects in the transmission of banana Xanthomonas wilt,” 2006, p. 60. |
| [22] | E. Karamura, M. Osiru, G. Blomme, C. Lusty, and P. Claudine, “Containing banana Xanthomonas wilt,” InfoMusa, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 45–46, 2005. |
| [23] | M. Mwangi and V. Nakato, "Key factors responsible for the Xanthomonas wilt epidemic on banana in East and Central Africa," 2007, pp. 395–404. |
| [24] | M. M. Shimwela et al., “Local and regional spread of banana Xanthomonas wilt (BXW) in space and time in Kagera, Tanzania,” Plant Pathology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1003–1014, 2017. |
| [25] | K. Jacobsen, “An emergency banana disease in East Africa,” Case studies of roots, tubers, and bananas seed systems, pp. 2016–3, 2016. |
| [26] | J. Nakakawa, J. Y. Mugisha, M. W. Shaw, W. Tinzaara, and E. Karamura, "Banana xanthomonas wilt infection: The role of de-budding and roguing as control options within a mixed cultivar plantation," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2017, 2017. |
| [27] | L. Mulugo, P. Kibwika, F. B. Kyazze, A. O. Bonaventure, and E. Kikulwe, "The contestations of diversity, culture, and commercialization: why tissue culture technology alone cannot solve the banana Xanthomonas wilt problem in central Uganda," Agriculture and Human Values, pp. 1–18, 2022. |
| [28] | P. Ji, H. Campbell, J. Kloepper, J. Jones, T. Suslow, and M. Wilson, “Integrated biological control of bacterial speck and spot of tomato under field conditions using foliar biological control agents and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria,” Biological control, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 358–367, 2006. |
| [29] | G. S. Raupach and J. W. Kloepper, “Mixtures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens,” Phytopathology, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 1158–1164, 1998. |
| [30] | Y. A. Nion and K. Toyota, “Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt diseases caused by Ralstonia solanacearum,” Microbes and environments, p. ME14144, 2015. |
| [31] | A. Vey, R. E. Hoagland, and T. M. Butt, “12 Toxic metabolites of fungal biocontrol agents,” Fungi as biocontrol agents, p. 311, 2001. |
| [32] | A. Z. Geberewold, "Review on the impact of banana bacterial wilt (Xanthomonas campestris pv. Musacerum) in East and Central Africa," Cogent Food & Agriculture, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1586075, 2019. |
| [33] | M. Fegan, “Bacterial wilt diseases of banana: evolution and ecology.,” Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex, pp. 379–386, 2005. |
| [34] | Y. Zhai, W. Wang, H. Tan, and L. Cao, “A new approach to analyzing endophytic actinobacterial population in the roots of banana plants (Musa sp., AAA),” Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 180–184, 2016. |
| [35] | J. K. Kwach, "Occurrence of banana Xanthomonas wilt in Kenya and potential approaches to rehabilitation of infected orchards," 2014. |
| [36] | R. M. Yeung and J. Morris, "Food safety risk: Consumer perception and purchase behavior," British food journal, 2001. |
| [37] | J. Jansma, H. Van Keulen, and J. Zadoks, “Crop protection in the year 2000: a comparison of current policies towards agrochemical usage in four West European countries,” Crop protection, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 483–489, 1993. |
| [38] | L. Tripathi, H. Atkinson, H. Roderick, J. Kubiriba, and J. N. Tripathi, “Genetically engineered bananas resistant to Xanthomonas wilt disease and nematodes,” Food and Energy Security, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 2017. |
| [39] | D. Becker, B. Dugdale, M. Smith, R. Harding, and J. Dale, “Genetic transformation of Cavendish banana (Musa spp. AAA group) cv’Grand Nain’via microprojectile bombardment,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 229–234, 2000. |
| [40] | L. Sági et al., “Genetic transformation of banana and plantain (Musa spp.) via particle bombardment,” Bio/Technology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 481–485, 1995. |
| [41] | T. Ganapathi, N. Higgs, P. Balint-Kurti, C. Arntzen, G. May, and J. Van Eck, “Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic cell suspensions of the banana cultivar Rasthali (AAB),” Plant cell reports, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2001. |
| [42] | H. Khanna, D. Becker, J. Kleidon, and J. Dale, "Centrifugation assisted Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (CAAT) of embryogenic cell suspensions of banana (Musa spp. Cavendish AAA and Ladyfinger AAB)," Molecular Breeding, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 239–252, 2004. |
| [43] | B. Namukwaya, L. Tripathi, J. Tripathi, G. Arinaitwe, S. Mukasa, and W. Tushemereirwe, “Transgenic banana expressing Pflp gene confers enhanced resistance to Xanthomonas wilt disease,” Transgenic research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 855–865, 2012. |
| [44] | L. Tripathi, H. Mwaka, J. N. Tripathi, and W. K. Tushemereirwe, “Expression of sweet pepper Hrap gene in banana enhances resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. musacearum,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 721–731, 2010. |
| [45] | S. F. Chandler and C. Sanchez, “Genetic modification; the development of transgenic ornamental plant varieties,” Plant biotechnology journal, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 891–903, 2012. |
| [46] | L. Tripathi, V. O. Ntui, and J. N. Tripathi, “CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing of banana for disease resistance,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 56, pp. 118–126, 2020. |
| [47] | L. Bortesi and R. Fischer, “The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond,” Biotechnology advances, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2015. |
| [48] | Z. Zhong et al., “Plant genome editing using FnCpf1 and LbCpf1 nucleases at redefined and altered PAM sites,” Molecular plant, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 999–1002, 2018. |
| [49] | V. O. Ntui, J. N. Tripathi, and L. Tripathi, “Robust CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing tool for banana and plantain (Musa spp.),” Current Plant Biology, vol. 21, p. 100128, 2020. |
| [50] | N. Kaur, A. Alok, N. Kaur, P. Pandey, P. Awasthi, and S. Tiwari, “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient editing in phytoene desaturase (PDS) demonstrates precise manipulation in banana cv. Rasthali genome,” Functional & integrative genomics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 2018. |
| [51] | J.-F. Li et al., "Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9," Nature biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 688–691, 2013. |
| [52] | J. N. Tripathi, V. O. Ntui, M. Ron, S. K. Muiruri, A. Britt, and L. Tripathi, “CRISPR/Cas9 editing of endogenous banana streak virus in the B genome of Musa spp. overcomes a major challenge in banana breeding,” Communications Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019. |
| [53] | J. N. Tripathi, V. O. Ntui, T. Shah, and L. Tripathi, “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of DMR6 orthologue in banana (Musa spp.) confers enhanced resistance to bacterial disease,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 19, no. 7, p. 1291, 2021. |
| [54] | T. Zeilmaker et al., “DOWNY MILDEW RESISTANT 6 and DMR 6-LIKE OXYGENASE 1 are partially redundant but distinct suppressors of immunity in Arabidopsis,” The Plant Journal, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 210–222, 2015. |
| [55] | D. P. de T. Thomazella et al., “Loss of function of a DMR6 ortholog in tomato confers broad-spectrum disease resistance,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 27, p. e2026152118, 2021. |
APA Style
Dancun Muchira, Elias Mwangi, Richard Oduor. (2022). A Review of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) Current Control Measures and Genome Editing as a Potential Intervention. International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 7(3), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12
ACS Style
Dancun Muchira; Elias Mwangi; Richard Oduor. A Review of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) Current Control Measures and Genome Editing as a Potential Intervention. Int. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 7(3), 118-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12,
author = {Dancun Muchira and Elias Mwangi and Richard Oduor},
title = {A Review of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) Current Control Measures and Genome Editing as a Potential Intervention},
journal = {International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology},
volume = {7},
number = {3},
pages = {118-123},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmb.20220703.12},
abstract = {Bananas are important to millions of people around the world as a source of food and income. Many children especially from the African continent eat mashed bananas as their first solid food during weaning. Banana Xanthomonas wilt (BXW) is a huge threat to banana production and if nothing is done to control the disease, 50% of production could be lost. Different interventions towards the control of the wilt have been tried, including cultural, biological, chemical, and genetic modifications. However, measures are inadequate in their capacities. The cultural methods are hindered by inconsistencies by farmers while administering. Biological, chemical, and genetic modifications face the challenge of resistance that might arise due to pathogen evolution. In addition, genetic modification attracts non-acceptance due to the novel genes introduced into the crop and the misconceptions created by interested groups. There is, therefore, a need to embrace new technological advances like gene editing (GE) which is viewed as the future of creating resistance in crops against diseases because, unlike genetic modifications, the novel genes are removed through the cell's natural processes. GE technology utilizes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9) to target genes intending to create resistance by knocking the susceptible genes out or by activating the expression of the defense genes. This review gives a synopsis of BXW's current control measures and the potential that GE has to address the disease more adequately.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Review of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) Current Control Measures and Genome Editing as a Potential Intervention AU - Dancun Muchira AU - Elias Mwangi AU - Richard Oduor Y1 - 2022/08/05 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12 T2 - International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology JF - International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology JO - International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology SP - 118 EP - 123 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9686 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmb.20220703.12 AB - Bananas are important to millions of people around the world as a source of food and income. Many children especially from the African continent eat mashed bananas as their first solid food during weaning. Banana Xanthomonas wilt (BXW) is a huge threat to banana production and if nothing is done to control the disease, 50% of production could be lost. Different interventions towards the control of the wilt have been tried, including cultural, biological, chemical, and genetic modifications. However, measures are inadequate in their capacities. The cultural methods are hindered by inconsistencies by farmers while administering. Biological, chemical, and genetic modifications face the challenge of resistance that might arise due to pathogen evolution. In addition, genetic modification attracts non-acceptance due to the novel genes introduced into the crop and the misconceptions created by interested groups. There is, therefore, a need to embrace new technological advances like gene editing (GE) which is viewed as the future of creating resistance in crops against diseases because, unlike genetic modifications, the novel genes are removed through the cell's natural processes. GE technology utilizes clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9) to target genes intending to create resistance by knocking the susceptible genes out or by activating the expression of the defense genes. This review gives a synopsis of BXW's current control measures and the potential that GE has to address the disease more adequately. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -
Email: